1. What was specifically revised one draft to another?
Well. my rough draft was simply the raw recordings of what I planned to turn into my talk radio segment. So all the spoofs and mistakes were cut out and everything was stitched together.
2. Point to global changes: how did you reconsider your thesis or organization?
I knew what my thesis was all along, but I did change my organization up quite a bit. Before I started, I didn't even think about having an intro and conclusion to the actual interview the way it is. Because my voice sounded different because I was recording in a different spot, I decided to make the interview a past recording that I am just now putting on air.
3. What led you to these changes?
I figured that it would make more sense, but also, it allowed me to talk about the interview and explain things I wouldn't if Reff was still sitting right in front of me.
4. How do these changes affect my credibility?
I think it made me seem more knowledgeable because I could explain more in depth what is going on and what certain things mean. It increases my credibility by showing my understanding.
5. How do these changes better address the audience or venue?
Like I said, it helped me to explain points and my opinion better.
6. Point to the local changes: how did I reconsider sentence structure and style?
This was not a main concern because my speech act was audio, but I did work on my tone.
7. How will these changes assist my audience in understanding my purpose?
My tone helps people know that I am passionate about what I believe is right.
8. Did I have to reconsider the conventinos of the particular genre?
Yes. I still don't know if I got them right, but I just kept gong back and listening to other examples.
9. How does the process of reflection help my reconsider my identity as a writer?
It helps me think about what I need improvement on and where I have strengths. This was new for me so it showed me how fun new genres can be,
No comments:
Post a Comment